●（序）
魏何(he)晏(yan)注(zhu)(zhu)(zhu)，宋邢疏(shu)。字叔明，曹州济阴人(ren)。太平兴国(guo)中擢九经(jing)(jing)及第(di)，官(guan)至(zhi)礼部《尚书》，事迹具《宋史》本(ben)(ben)传。是(shi)(shi)书盖(gai)咸(xian)平二(er)年(nian)诏改定旧疏(shu)，颁列学(xue)官(guan)。至(zhi)今(jin)(jin)(jin)承用，而(er)(er)(er)传刻颇讹。《集解(jie)》所(suo)引十三家，今(jin)(jin)(jin)本(ben)(ben)各题曰(yue)：“某氏(shi)(shi)”，皇(huang)(huang)侃(kan)《义(yi)疏(shu)》则(ze)均题其(qi)(qi)名(ming)(ming)。案奏进序(xu)中称“集诸(zhu)家之(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)善，记其(qi)(qi)姓(xing)名(ming)(ming)，”侃(kan)《疏(shu)》亦曰(yue)：“何(he)《集注(zhu)(zhu)(zhu)》皆(jie)呼人(ren)名(ming)(ming)，惟包独言‘氏(shi)(shi)’者，包名(ming)(ming)咸(xian)，何(he)家讳(hui)咸(xian)，故不(bu)(bu)言也(ye)”，与序(xu)文合，知(zhi)今(jin)(jin)(jin)本(ben)(ben)为(wei)後(hou)来(lai)刊(kan)版之(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)省文。然周氏(shi)(shi)与周生(sheng)烈遂不(bu)(bu)可(ke)分(fen)，殊不(bu)(bu)如皇(huang)(huang)本(ben)(ben)之(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)有(you)别。考(kao)邢《疏(shu)》中亦载皇(huang)(huang)侃(kan)何(he)氏(shi)(shi)讳(hui)咸(xian)之(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)语(yu)，其(qi)(qi)疏(shu)“记其(qi)(qi)姓(xing)名(ming)(ming)”句则(ze)云(yun)：“注(zhu)(zhu)(zhu)但记其(qi)(qi)姓(xing)，而(er)(er)(er)此连言名(ming)(ming)者，以(yi)(yi)著其(qi)(qi)姓(xing)所(suo)以(yi)(yi)名(ming)(ming)其(qi)(qi)人(ren)，非谓名(ming)(ming)字之(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)‘名(ming)(ming)’也(ye)。”是(shi)(shi)所(suo)见(jian)之(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)本(ben)(ben)已(yi)惟题姓(xing)，故有(you)是(shi)(shi)曲说。《七经(jing)(jing)孟子(zi)考(kao)文》称其(qi)(qi)国(guo)皇(huang)(huang)侃(kan)《义(yi)疏(shu)》本(ben)(ben)为(wei)唐代(dai)所(suo)传，是(shi)(shi)亦一(yi)(yi)证矣。其(qi)(qi)文与皇(huang)(huang)《疏(shu)》所(suo)载亦异同(tong)不(bu)(bu)一(yi)(yi)，大(da)抵互有(you)长短。如《学(xue)而(er)(er)(er)》篇(pian)“不(bu)(bu)患(huan)人(ren)之(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)不(bu)(bu)己(ji)知(zhi)”章，皇(huang)(huang)《疏(shu)》有(you)王(wang)肃注(zhu)(zhu)(zhu)一(yi)(yi)条，《里(li)仁》篇(pian)“君子(zi)之(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)於天下(xia)也(ye)”章，皇(huang)(huang)《疏(shu)》有(you)何(he)晏(yan)注(zhu)(zhu)(zhu)一(yi)(yi)条，今(jin)(jin)(jin)本(ben)(ben)皆(jie)无。观(guan)顾炎武之(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)《石经(jing)(jing)考(kao)》以(yi)(yi)石经(jing)(jing)《仪礼》校(xiao)监版，或并经(jing)(jing)文全节漏(lou)落(luo)，则(ze)今(jin)(jin)(jin)本(ben)(ben)《集解(jie)》传刻佚脱，盖(gai)所(suo)不(bu)(bu)免。然蔡邕(yong)石经(jing)(jing)《论(lun)(lun)(lun)语(yu)》於“而(er)(er)(er)在萧(xiao)墙(qiang)之(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)内(nei)”句，两本(ben)(ben)并存，见(jian)於《隶释(shi)》。陆德(de)明《经(jing)(jing)典释(shi)文》於诸(zhu)本(ben)(ben)同(tong)异，亦皆(jie)并存。盖(gai)唐以(yi)(yi)前经(jing)(jing)师授受(shou)，各守专门(men)，虽经(jing)(jing)文亦不(bu)(bu)能画一(yi)(yi)，无论(lun)(lun)(lun)注(zhu)(zhu)(zhu)文。固不(bu)(bu)必(bi)以(yi)(yi)此改彼(bi)(bi)，亦不(bu)(bu)必(bi)以(yi)(yi)彼(bi)(bi)改此。今(jin)(jin)(jin)仍从今(jin)(jin)(jin)本(ben)(ben)录之(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)，所(suo)以(yi)(yi)各存其(qi)(qi)旧也(ye)。《疏(shu)》，《宋志》作十卷(juan)，今(jin)(jin)(jin)本(ben)(ben)二(er)十卷(juan)，盖(gai)後(hou)人(ren)依《论(lun)(lun)(lun)语(yu)》篇(pian)第(di)析之(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)。晁公武《读书志》称其(qi)(qi)亦因皇(huang)(huang)侃(kan)所(suo)采诸(zhu)儒之(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)说刊(kan)定而(er)(er)(er)成。今(jin)(jin)(jin)观(guan)其(qi)(qi)书，大(da)抵翦皇(huang)(huang)氏(shi)(shi)之(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)枝蔓，而(er)(er)(er)稍傅(fu)以(yi)(yi)义(yi)理(li)，汉学(xue)、宋学(xue)兹(zi)其(qi)(qi)转关(guan)。是(shi)(shi)《疏(shu)》出(chu)而(er)(er)(er)皇(huang)(huang)《疏(shu)》微，迨伊洛之(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)说出(chu)而(er)(er)(er)是(shi)(shi)《疏(shu)》又微．故《中兴书目》曰(yue)：“其(qi)(qi)书於章句训(xun)诂名(ming)(ming)物(wu)之(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)际详(xiang)矣”，盖(gai)微言其(qi)(qi)未造精微也(ye)。然先有(you)是(shi)(shi)《疏(shu)》，而(er)(er)(er)後(hou)讲学(xue)诸(zhu)儒得沿溯以(yi)(yi)窥其(qi)(qi)奥。祭(ji)先河而(er)(er)(er)後(hou)海，亦何(he)可(ke)以(yi)(yi)後(hou)来(lai)居上，遂尽废其(qi)(qi)功(gong)乎？